Name the change
What the programme is meant to change, and in whom.
Whether a social programme reached the people it was meant for, and whether it changed what they know or do.
A CSR programme is judged by what changed, not by how much was spent. The CSR Impact Study asks the people a programme was meant to reach what they saw, what they understood and what they did next, and measures how far the programme's own communication travelled.
It gives a funder, a board or a partner a record that stands up to questions, with the method written down beside the result.
What the programme is meant to change, and in whom.
A first set of answers before the programme starts, so change can be seen.
The same questions after the programme, with reach figures for its communication.
What moved, what did not, and what the study cannot prove.
Yes, but a baseline is then missing. We say so in the report and use comparison groups where they exist.
Yes, in the form agreed up front. Use of the StatAxis name needs our written permission.
Fieldwork is scoped in the brief. The brief states what is collected remotely and what needs people on the ground.
Platform data is YouTube today. Instagram and Facebook are planned for January 2027, X for 2027 and connected TV by July 2027, subject to each platform's data access terms; a brief says which parts are measured and which are asked.
Name the decision, the people and the date. We write the question back in a form the data can answer.